Approver | Group Chief Executive | Approved date | 11 July 2024 |
---|---|---|---|
Responsibility | Academic Directors | Effective date | 01 August 2024 |
Division | Domestic, International | Review date | 01 August 2026 |
Department | Academic | Policy Number | AAC01002 |
Performance Framework | Customer Focus |
This policy ensures that learners have access to an appeal process that is timely, fair, effective, consistent and conducted in a manner that is culturally appropriate to the learner, following the principles of natural justice.
Appeal: A request to review a decision made by the Institution that is related to or impacts a learner.
Appellant: Learner who has submitted an appeal of any appealable decision, action, or omission made by the Institution.
Advocate: The person who assists the learner by being present and guiding them through the process. The role will normally include observing the process followed and/or advising the learner regarding the process and options. An advocate can be the Student Success Advisor, Learning Advisor, their nominee, or any person nominated by the learner.
Delegated authority: The Academic Director (or delegate) who exercises delegated authority to resolve academic appeals, complaints, and learner disciplinary matters not resolved at a lower level for each business division.
Institution: The Institution referred to in this policy is 911±¬ÁÏÍø Academy or Ashton Warner Academy.
Approved policies and procedures are always intended to comply and conform with the current Ministry of Education, Tertiary Education Commission (TEC), New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA,) and other external agency legislation requirements and procedures.
Subject Matter |
Grounds for Appeal |
Appeal against an outcome of an academic process, academic result, academic progression, aegrotat, or academic integrity matter. |
Establish one of the following grounds for appeal: a. There is new information which has a bearing on the matter, and which was previously unavailable (and could not reasonably have been made available at the time the disputed decision was made), OR b. There was a flaw in the process relating to the decision the learner seeks to appeal. |
Appeal against a learner breach of discipline decision or a non-academic complaint. |
a. That the procedure used for the investigation, or the resolution was unfair or biased, OR b. That the decision of the investigator could not reasonably be sustained on the evidence, OR c. That significant new evidence which was not previously available has become available since the investigation, which could have a material effect on the decision made or the penalty imposed, OR d. That any disciplinary action/s taken are out of proportion to the nature of the breach of discipline and the full circumstances of the case. |